{"id":67072,"date":"2023-10-22T08:37:26","date_gmt":"2023-10-22T06:37:26","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/greatsynthesizers.com\/?p=67072"},"modified":"2024-01-03T18:15:54","modified_gmt":"2024-01-03T17:15:54","slug":"ob-x8-best-oberheim-ever-part-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/greatsynthesizers.com\/en\/general\/ob-x8-best-oberheim-ever-part-2\/","title":{"rendered":"OB-X8: BEST Oberheim ever? (Part 2)"},"content":{"rendered":"

Text: Matt Vrazo, Music: Stephane Garganigo (Barb)<\/em><\/p>\n

Quick summary of Part 1<\/strong><\/a>: The OB-X8 sounds like a vintage Oberheim<\/strong><\/span>. And it’s got all<\/em> the filters<\/strong> <\/span>(multimode SEM and CEM 3320).<\/p>\n

______________________________________________________<\/p>\n

3) It has a bunch of big knobs<\/span><\/strong><\/h2>\n

Yes, it has some menu stuff, but did you see the part about the knobs? Coming from a long run with the Oberheim Xpander and the Matrix-12, it’s hard to express how nice it is to just grab and turn. The same argument could also be made for the OB-6, but because many of its knobs are bipolar and also have strong null spots, you struggle to create small amounts of modulation.<\/p>\n

\"Oberheim<\/a><\/p>\n

Instead, like detuning, modulation on the OB-6 often goes from nothing to MAX<\/em> in only a few increments, which tends to not<\/em> be very musically useful. Programming this way requires enough patience (and failure) to almost negate it being knob-based to begin with …<\/p>\n

I had no real issues with the Oberheim Xpander<\/strong> interface, it’s probably the best implementation of a multi-menu interface every devised (the John Bowen Solaris<\/a><\/strong> comes in a close second builds on this admirably). But because features weren’t right in front of you, I often forgot they were even there. Every 4th or 5th patch I might remember to add glide\/portamento. Vibrato LFO?! Oh yeah!<\/p>\n

On that last note: one of the least discussed but possibly greatest additions to the OB-X8 is the programmable vibrato LFO. Wow, what a difference does that makes for programming, as it leaves the main LFO to handle filter\/PWM\/VCA. If you told me I had to choose between the duller sound of the Oberheim OB-8<\/a> <\/strong>(which I truly loved) or the slightly brighter OB-X8 and its programmable 2nd LFO, I would still go for the OB-X8. And I did.<\/p>\n

\"Oberheim<\/a><\/p>\n

And the OB-X8 isn’t exactly a slouch in the modulation department, having all the same Page 2 features as the 8 and then some new ones. I never found these mod features to be super useful on the OB-8. They could conjure up some clever (for the time) effects and add a little more dynamism to a sound but for me the core sound was always achieved with the front panel controls. Now there’s a menu for these Page 2 functions which has actually made them much more useful … seeing the actual value for Mod1 delay or attack time is a lot easier than trying to “hear” it first before you mess it up entirely by turning a knob.<\/p>\n

And now that LFO 2 is programmable, some of the other “clever” LFO features actually become useful. No, you can’t assign 5 LFOs to one oscillator like on the Xp, but similar to the OB-8 I always felt that a lot of the Xpander\/Matrix-12’s power was more about studio trickery in the 80s, when busy session musicians needed to be able to modify sounds quickly, rather than any attempt to truly be “modular”. No audio rate LFOs and less than snappy envelopes were always a big downside to the Xpander, so at a basic level it was really not that much more powerful than an OB-8 if you take out the FM and filter smorgasbord.<\/p>\n

\"Oberheim<\/a><\/p>\n

4) The Oberheim OB-X8 is NEW<\/span><\/strong><\/h2>\n

Another eyeroll from the peanut gallery no doubt but it’s hard to overstate how nice it is to turn on an Oberheim without first thinking, “what thing will not work right today?” Oberheims and Sequential synths didn’t just have an American sound, they also had an American build. This means that build quality suffered more on Mondays and Fridays and even then, mid-week QC was not rock solid. Moreover, it seems that a vast number of these machines have been subjected to the horrors of damp basements and my experience is that even if they worked fine to begin with, once they have spent 10 years ingesting dust, humidity, and rotting case foam, they will really never again work 100%, even after extensive repair. This is very unlike my experience with Japanese (Yamaha\/Korg) synths that literally have been mostly rust and still turned on and played fine.<\/p>\n

Ah, but your<\/em> Vintage OB synthesizer has been in a studio most of its life, pampered and loved and played continuously. The knobs are still probably stiff or<\/em> a pot wiper is grating against the resistance element somewhere or<\/em> they don’t all have consistent torque. Or the keys are uneven, the bushings shot… Or the autotune occasionally fails when it hasn’t been played for a while… Or there are volume difference between the upper\/lower voice cards that your tech simply\u00a0cannot<\/em> fix (it\u2019s ironically authentic then that the OB-X8 initially suffered from this same problem).<\/p>\n

\"Oberheim<\/a><\/p>\n

With so many things that can go wrong on a Vintage Oberheim, turning on the OB-X8 without<\/em> that apprehension is a welcome change!<\/p>\n

5) It\u2019s affordable<\/span><\/strong><\/h2>\n

My thesis here is meant to focus solely on the units themselves, but in 2023 it\u2019s impossible to not<\/em> mention the price of vintage units. As of right now, you will spend no less than $6-8K for anything in the \u201cOB\u201d family or a Two-Voice (Pro). Double that for a Four-Voice (you\u2019ll never see an Eight-Voice). All I will say is that these prices don\u2019t reflect sound<\/em>, but rather collector status<\/em> or investment potential, and there\u2019s no scenario where vintage pricing is justified relative to what you would pay for an OB-X8.<\/p>\n

6) Everything perfect? Well …<\/span><\/strong><\/h2>\n

Ok ok, so everything is perfect on the OB-X8? No, there is one major flaw: the oscillators will phase-lock. For those that haven’t experienced it, phase-locking is the occurrence of two oscillators naturally “syncing” to each other (as if you turned on the Sync function). On some synths they will lock and then stay that way until you significantly detune them, and on others they will drift apart on their own. The reason it’s not desirable is because those voices, now being perfectly in sync, are louder than the others and stand out like a sterile sore thumb.<\/p>\n

\"Oberheim<\/a><\/p>\n

It can technically happen on any synth, vintage or modern, though I\u2019ve honestly never heard it on a vintage synth, including any Oberheim. It seems to be more prominent these days probably thanks to modern design factors like cleaner power and close parts placement. I should note that phase-locking is not the same as the extremely tight unison you can get on the OB-X8 where there is virtually no movement between the oscillators … the OB-8 could also achieve this.<\/p>\n

All that being said, since I\u2019ve received my current unit I had to go out of my way to actually hear any phase-locking, and in my basic testing it actually seems to happen on one voice at a time, and only when it\u2019s tuned into the tightest <\/em>unison possible.<\/p>\n

Thankfully, the smallest amount of detuning on that voice will keep it from happening, as will any vibrato (oddly PWM doesn\u2019t stop it from occurring). But this isn\u2019t to say that you (or I) really have to think about preventing it in the first place. The voices have enough intra-oscillator variation across the keyboard that during normal playing I\u2019ve never heard it.<\/p>\n

\"Oberheim<\/a><\/p>\n

Ah yes … keyboard. On a more personal-preference note, I much prefer the OB-8’s Matsushita keybed over the OB-X8’s Fatar keybed. I’m not a player, but playing the lightning-quick keys of a black Yamaha CS, for example, can make me feel like one.<\/p>\n

Conversely, the sludgy Fatar keys almost dare you to try and play fast, so you don’t. I’m not sure how we got to this point. Synthesizers aren’t pianos but when it comes to key feel and weight, it kind of feels like the piano people have won. Or perhaps the marketing people simply figured out that if they used a more robust keybed they could also use the word “premium” and charge a little more.<\/p>\n

Whatever the case, unless you are well-attuned to this style of more resistant keyboard, your playing experience will feel different to a vintage OB. Perhaps this is one argument for the desktop version, where you can choose your own controller keybed.<\/p>\n

\"Oberheim<\/a><\/p>\n

Summary<\/u><\/strong><\/p>\n

Getting those two qualms out of the way, we get back to the sonic greatness of the OB-X8. The synth can muster the clich\u00e9d man-cave marketable sounds from \u201ctwo bands you probably heard yesterday on a classic rock station\u201d, no problem. But it is equally capable of a sensitivity and moodiness that is both more captivating and more relevant to modern electronic music.<\/p>\n

Think warm organic pads from Steve Roach “Structures from Silence” or Pulse Emitter (both OB-8 users) combined with the gauzy melancholy of Boards of Canada and some Roland Jupiter-6-style BP\/HP resonant sweeps.<\/p>\n

Adding velocity into the mix only adds to the expressivity of these types of sounds and the OB-X8 can easily hypnotize you with a few repeated notes and the slight natural variations in each one.<\/p>\n

\"Oberheim<\/a><\/p>\n

And while I can say that each of the OB-X8’s predecessors could capture different individual elements of the OB-X8, they could never do it all at once or in such an accessible, efficient package. And that, my friends, is why the OB-X8 is the best Oberheim ever.<\/p>\n

Text: Matt Vrazo<\/em><\/p>\n

\n

x<\/span>
\nMusic: Stephane Garganigo<\/a><\/em><\/p>\n\n\t

\n\t\t\t
<\/div>\n\t\t
<\/div>\n\t
<\/div>\n\t